Hi, Geoff It's me.
Thank you for your care and pedagogy but you are wrong about the way it happened: when I saw it, your ammendment was not yet there and I thought it could be a very well known reference to most of members and it would not be mentioned if not asked for. And I would like to read it! And the question was solved. In my opinion, what you added is very well know to most of members but one is somewhat free to still have a style of his own. Now, let's thank Jim Wilhite too for his fellowship! And to close it, some bandwidth will not be too excessive, in my opinion, when it concerns to main subject here: good AM ;-)) Vy 73 de Jose' - CT1AXG ------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:45:35 -0600 From: W5OMR/Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] AM modulation To: Discussion of AM Radio <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Jim Wilhite wrote: > Look here: > http://www.qsl.net/wa5bxo/amtech.html I imagine he was just catching up, and reading the list-mail, and saw the one message where I forgot to inclue the URL (which was immediatly done in the -next- message). A Lot of times, someone will ask the whole of the group a question. Instead of jumping in on -that- particular message, I'll read through the list, -first- to make sure it hasn't already been answered, -or-, someone elses point of view has been given (if that's what the situation requires) and one that is similar to mine has been brought to light, then there'd be no need for me to chime and and say (basically) -me, too-, unless my whole intent and purpose was to take up bandwidth. .../... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
