Fellow AM-ers, My recent message (Vote on RM-11305), although motivated by the best of intentions, resulted from a serious misunderstanding. In short, I was blissfully unaware that two significant rule making proceedings are underway. (Yep, I live in a vacuum...tube.)
My concern is the preservation of AM as a viable mode of operation. To that end, I should have suggested opposition to RM-11306. I'm sorry for and embarrassed by this mix-up. 73 de Dave, W4QCU Oak Ridge, TN
