Jim wrote: "RM 11305 simply opens the bands to all modes, it does not widen the present modes due to a rule change. The current rules would still be enforced"
What rules are you referring to? Pete, wa2cwa On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:28:49 -0600 "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "peter markavage" > > > > Cause they're wider, and with RM-11305, there are no bounds to > > "wideness". If you think you have QRM now, can you picture in the > future, > > AM, SSB, FM, CW, digital voice/data/multimedia, SSTV, maybe even a > form > > of ATV, etc. all trying to operate adjacent to each other on the > bands. > > RM 11305 simply opens the bands to all modes, it does not widen the > present > modes due to a rule change. The current rules would still be > enforced. > Sure some violate that, in fact I am considered by some near me in 5 > land to > be an ogre because there are some stations that are splattering and > I > pointed it out after trying to resolve it with the offending > stations. Now > everyone in the group is looking at their signals and the offenders > are > under pressure by many to reform. > > > > :"would make more of us gentlemen" - I guess by osmosis. I see no > other > > way it could happen. Of course then, why doesn't it currently > happen on > > the bands today. Why would any mode, any bandwidth, anywhere, all > of a > > sudden, make amateurs nicer than they are today?? > > > See above answer > > > > > :"Mode or bandwidth restrictions simply promote special interest > groups" > > - AM, SSB, CW, digital, SSTV, etc. etc. operations are all > special > > interest groups that form the backbone of the amateur radio > service. Some > > are just larger than others. > > > > Pete, > > > Yes they are Pete, why not give them additional room to operate? > > 73 Jim > W5JO
