John Coleman wrote, in part: "This might be a good time for me to inject the Woes of HiFI. HIFI is OK for use on ground wave without selective fading and of course when the spectrum is void of other QSOs. The problem that I have is the QRM/QRN that accompanies cross country QSOs when the band is open for that type of propagation...."

I connot deny that John makes some very good points. What I'm seeking, however, is a transmitter that is CAPABLE of high fidelity audio transmission when conditions are appropriate. The audio bandwidth can be controlled at the input end by processing -- from sophisticated, multi-layer schemes to simple microphone selection (an Astatic D-104 instead of a Neumann U 87, for instance) and thus tailor the transmission for the current propagation and adjacent traffic. But, when the band's quiet and we've got an "armchair" QSO going -- which is not all that unusual -- I like to transmit (and listen to) mellow, rich, high fidelity audio.

I strive for true, high-end "broadcast quality" audio on AM for two reasons. One is -- admittedly -- vanity. I'm an old broadcaster --need I say more? The other reason for my quest for hi-fi is to justify -- or rationalize -- the use of amplitude modulation. After all,, the digital modes and even SSB and CW are far more "robust" than AM and are vastly superior in the efficient and reliable exchange of data. Using AM as a pure, clinical communications mode is illogical. Most of us, I suspect, employ our AM gear solely for sentimental reasons. Some of us are taking a "busman's holiday" during our operating hours. Others are reliving nostalgia-sweetened memories of their early days in amateur radio. Still others are celebrating the romance of old technology. I'm doing all three and, in the end, that's why my largest single fiscal investment in ham gear (ever!) has been in my 32V-2 and R-388 combo. I could sell these beautifully crafted, lovingly restored (by Howard Mills) items and "upgrade" to a Ten Tec Orion, if I wished. Logically, that's what I should do.

Somehow, though, it just wouldn't be the same.

73,

Craig
W3CRR


Reply via email to