So this means that 99.9% supported the ARRL proposal? ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Markavage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, February 19, 2006 1:01 pm Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RM-11306 COMMENTS TALLY! To: [email protected] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I wonder what the other 550,000 U. S. amateurs, who didn't > respond, > think about it. As of 2/12/06, 658,883 U. S. amateurs. Using Paul's > numbers (695 against) indicates approx. .1% of the entire amateur > population. > > Pete, wa2cwa > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:10:20 -0500 "Brian Carling" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes: > > Look slike this ARRL Absurdity may be dead in the water if the > > FCC has an ounce of integrity left in them! > > > > K2ORC Reports: > > > > As of 1530 ET February 7, 2006 > > > > No doubt due to a backlog since there was quite a flurry of > filing > > activity in the final 24 hours, comments dated Feb. 6 have > > appeared today on the FCC's ECFS site. Our count will stop when > > the last 2/6/06 comment is filed. > > > > FOR AGAINST > > RM-11305 (CTT petition) 44 244 > > > > RM-11306 (ARRL petition) 143 695 > ______________________________________________________________ > AMRadio mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:[email protected] > AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net > AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb >
