Todd, KA1KAQ wrote:

The one rig that -needs- the most modifications to better the enjoyment of this particular peice of equipment, is the 75A series of recievers. In particular, the 75A-4, and I'm not sure that enough can be done to that reciever to bring it to be nearly as good as a properly aligned phase-shift receiver.


Rather than trying to re-design or rebuild the 75A-4 into something it was never meant to be, I prefer the other alternative: get another cool radio! Of course, I paid a fraction of the going epay-high price for mine or I wouldn't even be able to comment from experience. Seems like a lot of folks have paid big bucks for them because someone said they should.



That's my thoughts. I think the 75A-4's price is artifically inflated. They weren't/aren't -that- good of a reciever.


Another 'good' mod (at least one that's acceptable by the 'in' crowd, for a KW-1, would be to change out the 4-400's in the final, for 4-250's. The 810's would work better into those jugs, I think, as opposed to the 4-400's.

These, of course, are my personal opinions.


I looked into this many years ago and even picked up some 4-400Cs just for that reason. Electrically I believe they work a lot better, loafing along. The downside is: virtually no purty-red glow.



In Class C, tha'ts a -good- thing :) If you wanna see color, bias the modulator off about 50 to 100w above the dissapatoin level. (ie: 250TH's have 250w of dissapatoin. I run 2800v @ around 125mA of bias. A dull orange glow, but a glow, none-the-less)

I suppose that just because you can run a pair of 4-1000's in the final, doesn't mean you're gonna slap 4kVDC to the anodes, and load 'em up for 1000mA of plate current. 1500VDC @ 400mA is a good round number, for DC power input.

4-400's instead of 4-125's or 4-250's, for the same power out as the 4-125's would certainly have plenty of 'head room' to be completely, and fully modulated.


Paul does bring up an interesting point, too: roughly halfway through production the engineers (supposedly on Art's orders, but who knows now?) restricted the audio response further to give the transmitter more punch. Which design is correct or better? That's a matter of taste and opinion. I changed one resistor and one or two caps in mine when I first got it on the air back in August of 1990. Also bypassed the clipper, splatter choke, and changed the taps on the mod iron. Simple stuff that made a very noticable difference, and I sleep just fine at night.



Speculaton on my part says:
Back in those days, SSB was coming in, and band-space was a 'premium'. More restrictive audio, less fidelity, the result was that there was less of a 'foot-print' that the signal took. Orders from Art? Probably. Where did Art get his direction? Certainly there were lobbyists then, as well. Politics has been around longer than I care to think about.


>We, as the Providers of Good Homes when these transmitters reach private hands then have to decide whether to "restore" an already modified transmitter back to original, or functionally bring it up to the application where it can best be used.
>

I prefer the latter.  Just because it 'could' be a museum peice, doesn't
mean it 'has' to.  It was designed to 'work', by golly, WORK IT!


EXACTLY!

the idea of 'buying' a show-peice of equipment, and then not using it
because you don't want to damage it is counter-productive to the
activity of Ham Radio, in general, and not just the Boat-anchor crowd.


Yep, it makes good sense. Use it, have fun. If it breaks, fix it.



Rick is modifying a braodcast transmitter for use on the ham bands. Good for him! Bob is gonna xtal-ing up an old CB for use on the ham bands. horray! BC-610's are used on frequencies other than military issued/controlled. Does that mean that they're operating out of their specifications? Military Boatanchor General Coverage recievers... well, goodness me! They're not tuned to a military RTTY frequency, rather instead they're copying (*gasp*) AM Transmissoins on 75m? Oh, the Horror! Is the world gonna come to an end? The Sky is falling, the SKY is falling! </sarcasm>

What other hobby lets you have -this- much fun?  :-)

--
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR

Reply via email to