Yes the 160M is bullshit but like I just posted the small disclaimer at the bottom of the '98 bandplan. In particular, "These bandplans are voluntary and as such cannot legally be enforced..." is ominously not present in the band plan set to be put into effect on Jan. 1, 2008. Should we be reading this deep? I don't know but I have nothing but loathing and distrust for any of the embiciles from the ARRgghhL when they make decisions about amatuer radio on my behalf. Mod-U-Lator, Mike(y) W3SLK ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Macklin To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:28 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: IARU bandplan
I has a feeling you were looking somewhere else! LOL! The 75M, 40M and 20M AM centers of operation should not really be a problem. But look at 160M. NO AM! That's sure to PO the NE AM group! I don't have 160 capability so I have never listend to it. But I never though about 160 a a SSB band. Bob Macklin K5MYJ Seattle, Wa, "Real Radios Glow in the Dark" ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
