Not to defend his actions but if QST had continued to feature technical articles it would have lost readership and advertisers. At least QSX gives the technically astute community a place to interact. The current licensing requirements and the resultant less technical ham community do not have the interest in technical issues that hams did several decades ago - fact of life - unfortunately. 73 Mac WQ8U Hillsborough, NC
"D. Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another piece of major damage to amateur radio that has been credited to Rinaldo was taking in-depth technical articles out of QST and having them published in a separate publication, QEX, that full members must now pay extra to receive, leaving QST to be filled mostly with "human interest" drivel, ads and stale news. Don k4kyv ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body. ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
