There has been alot of discussion regarding electrolytic capacitor leakage. 
Here are the "official" specifications. The JAN-C-62 specification addresses 
the maximum acceptable allowable leakage for electrolytic capacitors. (There is 
also an EIA specification but it is the same as Jan-C-62). The formula is I = 
(K)(C)+0.3 where "I" is the maximum allowable leakage current in milliamperes, 
"C" is the capacitance in ufd, and "K" is a constant relative to the working 
voltage of the electrolytic capacitor. "K" = 0.01 for voltages up to 100 volts; 
"K" = 0.02 for working voltages between 101 and 250 volts; "K" = 0.025 for 
working voltages between 251 and 350 volts; and "K" = 0.04 for working voltages 
between 351 and 450 volts. Here are some an examples, a 20 ufd @ 450 volt 
capacitor has a maximum acceptable allowable leakage current of (0.04)(20)+0.3 
which works out to 1.1 ma.; while a 20 ufd @ 250 volts would have a maximum 
acceptable allowable leakage current of (0.02)(20)+0.0.3 which works out to  
0.7 ma. K4KYV hit the nail on the head with his comment that the leakage must 
be proportional the the capacitance. As you see by the formula, the allowable 
leakage is proportional to the capacitance.

It seams that everyone has their own opinion and method on reforming so I will 
throw method in the pot since it works well for me. I sell NOS can electrolytic 
cans so I built a couple custom reformers to condition them. One is for 150 
volt cans and the other for 450 volt cans. Each reformer can reform up to 30 
electrolytic sections at a time. I will only discuss the 450 volt reformer. It 
is basically a 450 volt supply that is regulated so it does not exceed 450 
volts as the reforming currents decrease. Each of the 30 reforming legs has has 
a 90K current limiting resistor in series with the capacitor which limits the 
current to 5 ma in a short circuit condition. Typically an unreformed capacitor 
will draw about 2 to 3 ma initially and leakage current usually drops of 
considerably in the first few hours. I can moniter the leakage current of each 
independent reforming leg with a 30 position switching system. The meter is 
switchable to read full scale currents of 8 ma, 1.6 ma, 0.8 ma and 0.16 ma. As 
an example, an unreformed capacitor that starts off drawing 2 ma will only have 
270 volts applied to it because if the current limiting resistor. As the 
capacitor reforms, the leakage current decreases and the voltage increases 
upward to 450 volts. Many my 20 ufd capacitors will reform to leakage values 
well below 0.05 ma @ 450 volts. I typically reform my capacitors for 3 days and 
then in addition, operate them at a full 450 volts for an additional 4 to 7 
days to endurance test them. One advantage of the 7 to 10 day reforming and 
endurance testing period is that on rare occasions some electrolytic fluid will 
weep through where the terminal pentrates the bottom seal. The extended testing 
period allows this condition to manifest itself. The 5 ma current limit is 
pretty safe and I have never had a capacitor explode on me even when they have 
had excessive leakage. I have reformed many capacitors using the above method I 
find the capacitors respond very well to this method.

Bob, K2GLO
______________________________________________________________
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

Reply via email to