> From: John Coleman <[email protected]> > Ok here's the deal. Otis runs a single 833 in the class C final and > modulates with a pair . The single 833A is in a circuit for push pull but > only has the one tube in it. and only one nuetralizing capacitor and only > one coupling capacitor to the ballanced tank with swinging link. The grid > circuit is a push pull tank but any other typewill work as it's only > function is to supply the proper driver to the final grid. The plate tank > is a push pull balance type because the phase inversion for the > neutralizing cap is accomplished by the ballanced plate tank. The tank > circuit is shunt fed to keep the DC and audio off of the tank circuit. > The center tap of the >coil does have a RF choke but it goes to ground to > insure that there is no audio or DC on the tank components.
I could have sworn when I lived in Houston that he had a pair of 833A's in the final of that rig. Did he once run a pair and later take one out? I also remember the unique spiral wound output coupling link as opposed to the more common solenoidal form, with each turn the same diameter and all turns side-by-side. I have thought about duplicating that link, because it would take up less space and allow more spacing between tank coil and link. I series feed my tank coil, so it has the full modulated DC on it. It has never arced over in the 36+ years since I built that rig, but if I finally get "round to" building the push-pull 833A rig I have had the parts for ever since I moved back here, I have thought about constructing the link in similar spiral fashion. But one thing I don't recall is exactly how he gets the lead from the central turn back outside the coil, past the other turns. Did he use some kind of insulation in between or just air spacing? There shouldn't be much voltage across the link, so I wouldn't think a lot of insulation would be necessary, but winding in that form would allow 6-8 turns of link to fit into the same space as a 2-turn link. I prefer to run the entire tank circuit above ground at full modulated plate voltage because that eliminates the problem of the plate choke(s), which must bear the full rf output voltage from the plate of the tube on all the bands that the transmitter works. The RF choke to the midtap of the tank coil is connected at an rf null point, so it is much less critical, and about any choke will work if it is capable of carrying the plate current. What did he ever do with the crapped-out 1930's vintage VM-5 modulation transformer he used to have sitting behind the transmitter at his old QTH? It would have been a shame to throw it away because that 600-watt transformer core with the audio laminations would be good for custom rewinding a new mod xfmr or mod reactor. I understand UTC used a different grade of iron for winding audio transformers from what they used to wind power transformers. Don k4kyv ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Post: [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the word unsubscribe in the message body. This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
