Maybe because the Valiant was *better* engineered. Remember the era - people were trying to get "talk power" out of AM, not hi-fi. So the clipping, compression, and restricted frequency range were all intended to enhance communications.
Nick K4NYW, running a 4-400 modulated by 807's. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Charles Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder why the Ranger would be among the best stock audio and the > Valiant among the worst? Same maker, same vintage, etc. > > 73 de W3NU > ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Post: [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the word unsubscribe in the message body. This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
