Larry, You are correct, it is a 6AC7. I guess I was seeing things.
I thought I read an article in an old CQ about hot-rodding a BC-348 1st RF with a 6AG7 (11000 umhos) but maybe it was the 6AC7 (9000 umhos) instead. Either one far outshines the 6K7 with a transconductance of 1650 umhos. I think I have a 6K7 around, and it would be interesting to compare sensitivity with one vs. the other, in the process of going back to the 6K7. Ray > >> I picked up a very modified BC-348-R, S/N 12436. It came with the 6AG7 >> in >> the 1ST RF Amp socket. > > Wow, that's odd. As my grandfather would have said, that's like using a > bulldozer to push a pebble. > > A 6AC7 or 6SG7 would make more sense. Sure it's not one of those? > > 73, > -Larry/NE1S > > -- > Pay a visit to my amateur radio web page at: > ne1s.rfburn.org ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Post: [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the word unsubscribe in the message body. This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
