Hey Jerry,

Here, at my location and with my radios, the Elk out-performs the Arrow 
hands-down. 

It's also rated for higher transmit power.

It has a single feed point and, so, doesn't need a diplexer if you're just 
using one dual-band radio, either semi- or full-duplex. 

Contrary to posts on this very board from a few years ago, the Elk works 
wonderfully well in full-duplex. You or anyone who's interested can contact me 
directly if you'd like to hear a 4+ - minute recording of an AO-51 pass I made 
using an Icom W32A HT in full-fuplex mode with my Elk. It includes contacts 
literally from Canada to Mexico.

The Elk costs about one-third less than the Arrow - although you'll have to 
spend less than a dollar for the PVC necessary to make a handle for it. 

Most importantly for me, the Elk hears much, much better than my Arrow ever 
did. My most recent proof came just this morning when I worked DJ8NY in CW on 
AO-7 in Mode B - while hand-holding the Elk inside my house on the second floor 
and pointing it at a windowless wall. Germany is my fourth European country in 
the past two weeks on AO-7 using the Elk in that fashion.

What might be more important for you, since you're planning to use it only for 
the FM satellites, is that its elements are all in the same plane. Since two of 
the three satellites (AO-27 and SO-50) are equipped with 0-gain quarter-wave 
verticals, you may find them easier to track with the Elk for that reason. I 
have. And that has been truse without any sacrifice in performance when working 
AO-51. It actually hears AO-51 better than my Arrow did, too.

ALL of that being said ... the Arrow does, indeed, work. I used one to earn 
Satellite VUCC, all handheld. However, I have no doubt that the Elk works 
better - for me, at least. I would have earned VUCC with it if I'd known about 
it when I started out working the satellites. I didn't, and so bought an Arrow 
because "everyone else was using one." They were, and many still are. But for 
me, there is no question that the Elk is the better choice - in performance and 
in price.

I hope this helps. Best of luck no matter which antenna you decide to go with. 

73,

Tim - N3TL
Athens, Ga. - EM84ha
-------------- Original message from Jerry Felts <[email protected]>: 
-------------- 


> I never really had the extra money but now I do. This would mainly be used 
> for the FM birds. Which do you like the best? The Elk or the Arrow antenna? 
> Going to order one in the next couple of days. 
> 
> -- 
> Jerry - NR5A - South Dakota 
> www.freewebs.com/nr5a 
> 
> http://nr5abikeblog.blogspot.com/ 
> 
> http://nr5abeaconblog.blogspot.com/ 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. 
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! 
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to