I beleive fractal antennas have been "ignored" because of patent issues.

On 13-Mar-10 22:26, Dave Marthouse wrote:
>              This seems almost too good to be true.  Keep in mind that I'm 
> not an engineer.  Maybe this technology could be used for future amateur 
> satellites, wider bandwidth, more gain, less space, etc.
> http://www.fractalantennas.com/
>
> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
> dmartho...@gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2743 - Release Date: 03/13/10 
> 07:33:00
>

-- 
Nigel A. Gunn,  1865 El Camino Drive, Xenia, OH 45385-1115, USA.  tel +1 937 
825 5032
Amateur Radio G8IFF W8IFF (was KC8NHF),  e-mail ni...@ngunn.net       www  
http://www.ngunn.net
Member of  ARRL, GQRP #11396, QRPARCI #11644, SOC #548,  Flying Pigs QRP Club 
International #385,
            Dayton ARA #2128, AMSAT-NA LM-1691,  AMSAT-UK 0182, MKARS,  ALC, 
GCARES, XWARN.

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to