----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg D." <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 7:47 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PC clock > > Hi Larry, > > Ok, I understand the need for an accurate clock, though I believe you're > expectations for being able to track an overhead pass is pushing the > limits of orbital prediction pretty hard. Another ham I know locally > tried this, and ultimately gave up. His issue was not one of clock > accuracy, but of Keps and the mathematics behind them. > > > Greg KO6TH > Hi Greg, KO6TH
When the software calculate the Az and the El of the satellite at the right time with an accurate clock then it send a command to the rotators but the antennas takes a certain time to go in that calculated position and when the antennas are finally there then the satellite is already in another position far advanced in it's orbital path particularly when the satellite pass is overhead. I dont think you want to run the motors every 5 or 10 seconds othervise your control relays will work as a machine-gun So the issue is not on clock accuracy or Keps or mathematics behind them but it is on the tracking system that we normally use to mimichaise the satellite position with a phase difference between the satellite calculated position and the actual antenna position when the traching command is sent to the motors. If you go over the roof and you follow the ISS by naked eye you will realize that your antenna pointing is always a little bit behind the ISS position in the sky and so a very accurate clock to track a LEO satellite is meaning less particularly using high gain antennas with a narrow main lobe. 73" de i8CVS Domenico _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
