Amsat needs a WIKI to store all of this valuable information for hams of 
the future...

Roger
WA1KAT

On 4/9/2011 10:53 PM, Art McBride wrote:
> Andrew,
> Both Duplexer and Diplexer allow for transmit and receive at the same time.
>
> A duplexer, as used on a 2 meter repeater has an extremely narrow filter
> allowing transmit on IE: 146.000 MHz and receive on 146.600 MHz. They
> typically use cavity resonators, each cavity is 30" tall and 7-10" in
> diameter and it takes 6 of them to make it work well. They must be tuned to
> the repeater transmit and receive frequencies.
>
> A Diplexer is a small box with two filters allowing you to transmit on two
> bands, receive on two bands, or transmit on one band and receive on the
> other band at the same time. The diplexer keeps the bands separate to
> prevent damage to the equipment on the other band.
>
> Also there exists a Triplexer which is the same as a Diplexer but it
> supports three bands. I have one here for 2M, 70cm, and 23cm. I use it on a
> triband base antenna with a Kenwood TM 741A
>
> A Diplexer or Triplexer can be used to connect antenna connectors of radios
> on different bands to a common coax, three antennas to a common coax or both
> to use one run of coax for two or more bands.
>
> The Circulator mentioned for the radar is different from the Duplexer and
> diplexer in that it allows the receiver and transmitter to be connected to
> the antenna while the transmitter is operating. There are T/R and anti T/R
> switches to prevent damage to the radar receiver during transmit and reflect
> receive signals that reach the transmitter to the receiver. This is a pulse
> echo system so receiver and Transmitter never function at the same time but
> require a fast antenna switching time. A typical marine radar, switches from
> Transmit to receive in 150 nS resulting in ~300 yards of "blindness"
> measured from the antenna to the first target the radar can see.
>
>
> I hope this clarifies the differences.
> Art,
> KC6UQH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rich [mailto:vk4...@tech-software.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 1:39 PM
> To: kc6...@cox.net; 'i8cvs'; 'Amsat - BBs'; 'Anthony Monteiro'
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Diplexer
>
> DU = TX RX
> DI = RX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Art McBride"<kc6...@cox.net>
> To: "'i8cvs'"<domenico.i8...@tin.it>; "'Amsat - BBs'"<amsat-bb@amsat.org>;
>
> "'Anthony Monteiro'"<aa...@comcast.net>
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:27 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Diplexer
>
>
>> As I understand it,
>> A Duplexer allows for transmission and reception to take place in the same
>> band using a single band antenna.
>> A Diplexer allows for transmission and reception to take place on
>> different
>> bands using a multi-band antenna.
>>
>> Art,
>> KC6UQH
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
>> Behalf Of i8cvs
>> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:35 AM
>> To: Amsat - BBs; Anthony Monteiro
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Diplexer
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anthony Monteiro"<aa...@comcast.net>
>> To:<amsat-bb@amsat.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:15 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Diplexer
>>
>>> A "duplexor" is a device that allows both transmitting and
>>> receiving over the same transmission line or antenna. It
>>> may or may not be a passive device and it may or may not
>>> be frequency selective.
>>>
>>> In WWII RADAR systems, a duplexor was used to allow
>>> the transmitter and receiver on the same frequency to
>>> share the same antenna. The duplexor was a waveguide
>>> device that had special gas-filled tubes to quickly
>>> switch the signal direction.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Tony AA2TX
>>>
>> Hi Tony, AA2TX
>>
>> I have in my hands the Instruction Book for Radar Recognition
>> Sets AN/UPX-6  of U.S. Navy  Department Bureau of Ships.
>>
>> The UPX6 is a IFF transponder on board of aicrafts and was used
>> in WWII for  Identification of Friend or Foe.
>>
>> The UPX-6  can transmit from 1010-1030 MHz and receive from
>> 1090-1110 MHz and allows both transmitting and receiving over
>> the same transmission line and antenna via a circuit  made of coax
>> cable RG-58/CU that the manual calls a   "DUPLEXER" and not
>> a "duplexor".
>>
>> This "duplexer" is working on the fact that a transmission line,
>> shorted at the far end a quarter wavelenght long for the incoming
>> signal,represent infinite impedance (an open circuit) at the sending
>> end of the line.
>>
>> The UPX-6 was converted in the early 1980's to be used on 1296 MHz
>> and an interesting article written by W6NBI was published in Ham
>> Radio Magazine march 1981
>>
>> I modified it and I got 40 watt output.......not too bad for that epoch
>> time !
>>
>> Best 73" de
>>
>> i8CVS Domenico
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature
>> database 6027 (20110408) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature
>> database 6029 (20110409) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 6029 (20110409) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 6029 (20110409) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to