Graham, Here is one source. http://www.micro-coax.com/pages/products/producttypes/cabletypes/Semi-RigidCoaxialCable.asp Semi rigid coax with SMA or SMB connectors. Most of them have teflon insulators which meet all the space specs.
Lou McFadin W5DID [email protected] On Apr 20, 2011, at 11:12 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements (Bill Howell) > 2. ISS Over North America (Clint Bradford) > 3. Re For sale (Gerry) > 4. XE3DX Activity EK18-EK19. (David Maciel) > 5. XE3DX Activity EK18-EK19. Correct SORRY (David Maciel) > 6. PLAN-13 porting to visual studio (Andy Brian) > 7. Re: HF Satellite Experiment (Richard Limebear) > 8. CN77 (Bob- W7LRD) > 9. Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements (KM9U) > 10. advice request for FUNcube (Graham Shirville) > 11. AO-51 down 1150 utc 20 April (Mark L. Hammond) > 12. Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? (Joe) > 13. Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements (Zachary Beougher) > 14. Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? (Zachary Beougher) > 15. Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? (Stephen Davis) > 16. Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements (Tom Workman) > 17. Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:10:05 -0500 > From: Bill Howell <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > To: Tom Workman <[email protected]> > Cc: Amsat List <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Tom, > > Here's the link. Scroll down a bit for Sat specifics... > http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%2520Instructions/N5JB.pdf > > N5AB > > On Apr 19, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Tom Workman wrote: > >> I've decided to give Logbook of the World (LOTW) another try. I >> keep losing >> my passwords and have to start over. Maybe I'll write them down >> this time >> :-) >> >> When I tried uploading a couple of my satellite QSOs as a test LOTW >> says >> that the MODE field is invalid. I had entered "SAT". I know this >> has been >> discussed in recent months here but I couldn't find that >> discusssion in >> looking at the archives. Would someone put me on the right track as >> to what >> fields are required for a satellite QSO to be considered valid by >> LOTW? >> >> Thanks. >> Tom - K?TW >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the >> author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite >> program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:37:33 -0700 > From: Clint Bradford <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS Over North America > To: AMSAT BB <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII > > ISS passes over North America make WIRED Magazine ... > > Look Up: Spectacular Space Station Flybys This Week | Wired Science | > Wired.com http://bit.ly/hs0pZu > > Clint > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:21:52 -0500 > From: "Gerry" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re For sale > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Trak-Box sold > > Further listing of items to follow. > > Gerry VE4GTB > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:17:00 -0500 > From: "David Maciel" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] XE3DX Activity EK18-EK19. > To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;> > Message-ID: <6D3F92A12B30463DB66A7E5DA3AC9F29@Dell> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > now I can send the job the next day, I be in some passes just listening, > some stationsdid not respect my work or others, many removed rework > opportunity to others, call upothers. if someone wants to can send me > an email and tell me you want the grid towork, I will always be happy to > help. please use the international phonetic code,M will always be "Mike" > never change it for "mexico". everything will be easier. > > > 20/april/2011 02:29Z SO-50 EK19 18:32 pm > 20/april/2011 04:09Z SO-50 EK19 18:32 pm > 20/april/2011 11:54Z AO-51 EK19 18:32 pm > 20/april/2011 12:51Z SO-50 EK19 18:32 pm > 20/april/2011 19:40Z AO-27 EK18 18:32 pm > 20/april/2011 21:15Z AO-51 EK18 04:15 pm > 20/april/2011 22:52Z AO-51 EK18 17:52 pm > 21/april/2011 02:56Z SO-50 EK18 21:56 pm > > > > Dave > EK18 EK19 > > Next ===>EK08 EK08 > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:45:55 -0500 > From: "David Maciel" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] XE3DX Activity EK18-EK19. Correct SORRY > To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;> > Message-ID: <D249AF895F274ACE83DFD6BFA9646B3B@Dell> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > From: David Maciel > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:17 PM > Subject: XE3DX Activity EK18-EK19. > > > now I can send the job the next day, I be in some passes just listening, > some stationsdid not respect my work or others, many removed rework > opportunity to others, call upothers. if someone wants to can send me > an email and tell me you want the grid towork, I will always be happy to > help. please use the international phonetic code,M will always be "Mike" > never change it for "mexico". everything will be easier. > > > 20/april/2011 02:29Z SO-50 EK19 > 20/april/2011 04:09Z SO-50 EK19 > 20/april/2011 11:54Z AO-51 EK19 > 20/april/2011 12:51Z SO-50 EK19 > 20/april/2011 19:40Z AO-27 EK18 > 20/april/2011 21:15Z AO-51 EK18 > 20/april/2011 22:52Z AO-51 EK18 > 21/april/2011 02:56Z SO-50 EK18 > > > > Dave > EK18 EK19 > Next ===>EK08 EK08 > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:20:33 +0200 > From: Andy Brian <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] PLAN-13 porting to visual studio > To: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > > Anyone succefuly ported PLAN-13 tracking programe to Microsost Visual studio? > I having problem with header unistd.h and function > "strncasecmp(buffer, satellite,strlen(satellite)) " > > best regards Andy > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:03:04 +0100 > From: Richard Limebear <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: HF Satellite Experiment > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Bob > >> The idea is a keyed CW oscillator on 7.010 MHz with harmonics on 14.020, >> 21.030 and 28.040 MHz. > > As an HF operator may I suggest you have a base frequency of 7.020 or higher > rather than 7010. The lower parts of the bands can get quite congested at > times > so this would give ground stations a better chance of hearing them. Certainly > 7.020 is often occupied. > > 73 > Richard G3RWL > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:40:53 +0000 (UTC) > From: Bob- W7LRD <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] CN77 > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > > <741254962.118705.1303285253165.javamail.r...@sz0126a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > > hello > > I am planning on putting CN77 on the satellites several times later this > spring and summer.? Will anounce on this bb well in advance. > > 73 Bob W7LRD > > CN87 > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:37:02 -0400 > From: "KM9U" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <F98569F8573249D7821A24DA4673288C@dv9000> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > I just read the LOTW FAQ and it stated that the satellite name HO-68 is > supported by LOTW. > I have never been able to upload any logs containing HO-68 as the sat name. > TQSL 1.13 does not have HO-68 in the satellite drop-down menu box. > > Is there something I'm missing? > > Chuck, KM9U > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 22:48 > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > > >> Hi Tom! >> >>> When I tried uploading a couple of my satellite QSOs as a test LOTW says >>> that the MODE field is invalid. I had entered "SAT". I know this has been >>> discussed in recent months here but I couldn't find that discusssion in >>> looking at the archives. Would someone put me on the right track as to >>> what >>> fields are required for a satellite QSO to be considered valid by LOTW? >> >> The MODE field refers to the transmission mode - FM, SSB, etc. The >> fields related to a satellite QSO are PROP_MODE (this is always set >> to "SAT") and SAT_NAME matches the names in the list at: >> >> https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq >> >> I'm pretty sure Rick e-mailed you the PDF written by N5JB that shows >> the 7 fields that must be present for a valid satellite QSO in LOTW, >> including the two I mentioned above. Others can be added, but are >> optional. The document is found at: >> >> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf >> >> Hope to see some of our QSOs match up as QSLs in LOTW soon. >> >> 73! >> >> >> >> >> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK >> http://www.wd9ewk.net/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:41:13 +0100 > From: "Graham Shirville" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] advice request for FUNcube > To: "CubeSat @ CubeSat.org" <[email protected]>, "AMSAT BB" > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > hi All, > > A simple question this time! > > What is the best coax cable to use in a cubesat? Size, flexibility/min > radius, existing space heritage, ease of applying connectors are our main > design drivers - we are only using UHF and VHF so losses are not going to be > too much of a problem hopefully.. > > many thanks in advance > > 73 > > Graham > G3VZV > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:16:20 -0400 > From: "Mark L. Hammond" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-51 down 1150 utc 20 April > To: Amsat - BBs <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi All, > > This morning AO-51 was down on the early AM pass. I reset it, and decreased > power out. One orbit later, it is apparently down again (another battery > trip). There just isn't much left in the battery. > > It will this afternoon before one of us (command stations) can turn it back > on. > > It is likely that we'll be going to PL tone activation soon. Please check > your radio memories and PL tones; it'll be 67 Hz once we activate it. > > We'll provide updates here on the BB. > > 73, > > > > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:21:04 -0500 > From: Joe <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Can we please have the location of the launch? I know it has a 2 land > call sign, but now days that's meaningless. > > Plus the date and time. How about in UTC time for both? This > announcement says, > > The current target for executing launch of PBH-15 is between 11:00PM -- > 12:00AM on Thursday (4/21)/Friday (4/22), weather and approval permitting. > > But especially the midnight thing and then EDT CDTGMT, since there is no > indication of launch site, 11:00 PM Where? Lets keep everything in > Amateur Radio on one time zone please? UTC. aka: GMT. > > Joe WB9SBD > > The Original Rolling Ball Clock > Idle Tyme > Idle-Tyme.com > http://www.idle-tyme.com > > On 4/19/2011 3:22 PM, Bob Bruninga wrote: >> KC2TUA announces: Balloon attempt across the Atlantic. 21 April 2011 >> >> Hams in the USA and worldwide are needed to listen on 7.1023 and 10.1466 MHz >> and to send readings of the balloon's progress to [email protected]. More >> information about the program, including the latest projected flight path, >> can be found at http://www.projectbluehorizon.com/ >> https://twitter.com/PBH5. >> >> It also has an APRS GPS tracker on 144.39 with the callsign KC2ZJH and will >> launch from Oswego, NY around midnight Thursday. Thanks in advance for your >> help! >> >> The HF downlink exact frequency will vary 10 Hz or so with temperature. >> Accurate recording of frequency will be useful. >> >> 73, >> -Tom Triebwasser >> PBH Alumnus '09 >> KC2TUA >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The Project Blue Horizon Increment 5 (PBH V) team has finalized a launch >> window for the third and final flight of Increment 5; launch of PBH-15 is >> tentatively planned for 4/21/11 -- 4/22/11. The team will be rolling out GO/ >> NO-GO communications to all parties to provide adequate time for interested >> individuals to plan accordingly for observing the launch or tracking and >> following the mission progress. >> >> The PBH-15 mission will be the Increment 5 teams attempt at breaking the >> current ARHAB distance (3,361.81 miles) and duration (49 hours, 45 minutes) >> records. It will include integration of an altitude control mechanism for >> reducing air vehicle weight during flight to sustain float and 30m HF >> communications via an Enhanced Morse Decoder provided by Dylan Thorner of >> Enhanced Solutions. PBH-15 will be lifted with a 54,000 cubic foot >> Zero-pressure envelope and is projected to float for long durations between >> 85,000-110,000. >> >> The current target for executing launch of PBH-15 is between 11:00PM -- >> 12:00AM on Thursday (4/21)/Friday (4/22), weather and approval permitting. >> >> At conclusion of Thursday's Flight Readiness Review (2PM - 3PM), the team >> will provide updated GO/ NO-GO information. >> >> During the PBH-15 mission, the Twitter feed will be updated in 30 minute >> increments at: http://twitter.com/PBH5 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> For those interested in tracking the Mission Payload, the following band >> plan and call signs will be used for PBH-15: >> >> Function >> Frequency >> Required >> HAM Level >> >> Payload >> Call Sign >> Primary Voice / Mission Communication >> 147.500MHz >> Technician >> >> Mission Payload HF (40m) >> N2XE >> Secondary Voice / Mission Communication >> Owego Repeater (Duplex) >> 146.760MHz >> Technician >> >> Mission Payload HF (30m) >> N2XE >> >> >> >> >> Mission Payload APRS >> KC2ZJH >> APRS >> 144.390MHz >> Technician >> >> >> >> 40m HF (Morse Code) >> See attached >> Technician >> >> >> >> 30m HF (Morse Code) >> See attached >> General >> >> >> >> >> Users can input data received from the Mission Payload via the "User Input" >> tab at http://www.projectbluehorizon.com/. >> >> Points received from the PBH-15 payload over HF can also be submitted to: >> [email protected] >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matthew T. Lewis >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >> >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:28:12 -0400 > From: "Zachary Beougher" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > To: "KM9U" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > I have TQSL 1.13 and it supports HO68 and SO67.... It is supposedly the > latest version. > > Zack > KD8KSN > > -----Original Message----- > From: KM9U > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:37 AM > To: [email protected] ; [email protected] > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > > I just read the LOTW FAQ and it stated that the satellite name HO-68 is > supported by LOTW. > I have never been able to upload any logs containing HO-68 as the sat name. > TQSL 1.13 does not have HO-68 in the satellite drop-down menu box. > > Is there something I'm missing? > > Chuck, KM9U > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 22:48 > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > > >> Hi Tom! >> >>> When I tried uploading a couple of my satellite QSOs as a test LOTW says >>> that the MODE field is invalid. I had entered "SAT". I know this has been >>> discussed in recent months here but I couldn't find that discusssion in >>> looking at the archives. Would someone put me on the right track as to >>> what >>> fields are required for a satellite QSO to be considered valid by LOTW? >> >> The MODE field refers to the transmission mode - FM, SSB, etc. The >> fields related to a satellite QSO are PROP_MODE (this is always set >> to "SAT") and SAT_NAME matches the names in the list at: >> >> https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq >> >> I'm pretty sure Rick e-mailed you the PDF written by N5JB that shows >> the 7 fields that must be present for a valid satellite QSO in LOTW, >> including the two I mentioned above. Others can be added, but are >> optional. The document is found at: >> >> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf >> >> Hope to see some of our QSOs match up as QSLs in LOTW soon. >> >> 73! >> >> >> >> >> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK >> http://www.wd9ewk.net/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:47:12 -0400 > From: "Zachary Beougher" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? > To: "Joe" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi Joe, > > I think you overlooked the paragraph - it is #3 in the original email. > >> It also has an APRS GPS tracker on 144.39 >> with the callsign KC2ZJH and will launch from >> *Oswego, NY* around midnight Thursday. > > Being that NY is EST, it would be scheduled to launch sometime between > 22/0300z and 23/0400z. > > I think that is right... > > 73, > > Zack > KD8KSN > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 9:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? > > Can we please have the location of the launch? I know it has a 2 land > call sign, but now days that's meaningless. > > Plus the date and time. How about in UTC time for both? This > announcement says, > > The current target for executing launch of PBH-15 is between 11:00PM -- > 12:00AM on Thursday (4/21)/Friday (4/22), weather and approval permitting. > > But especially the midnight thing and then EDT CDTGMT, since there is no > indication of launch site, 11:00 PM Where? Lets keep everything in > Amateur Radio on one time zone please? UTC. aka: GMT. > > Joe WB9SBD > > The Original Rolling Ball Clock > Idle Tyme > Idle-Tyme.com > http://www.idle-tyme.com > > On 4/19/2011 3:22 PM, Bob Bruninga wrote: >> KC2TUA announces: Balloon attempt across the Atlantic. 21 April 2011 >> >> Hams in the USA and worldwide are needed to listen on 7.1023 and 10.1466 >> MHz >> and to send readings of the balloon's progress to [email protected]. >> More >> information about the program, including the latest projected flight path, >> can be found at http://www.projectbluehorizon.com/ >> https://twitter.com/PBH5. >> >> It also has an APRS GPS tracker on 144.39 with the callsign KC2ZJH and >> will >> launch from Oswego, NY around midnight Thursday. Thanks in advance for >> your >> help! >> >> The HF downlink exact frequency will vary 10 Hz or so with temperature. >> Accurate recording of frequency will be useful. >> >> 73, >> -Tom Triebwasser >> PBH Alumnus '09 >> KC2TUA >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The Project Blue Horizon Increment 5 (PBH V) team has finalized a launch >> window for the third and final flight of Increment 5; launch of PBH-15 is >> tentatively planned for 4/21/11 -- 4/22/11. The team will be rolling out >> GO/ >> NO-GO communications to all parties to provide adequate time for >> interested >> individuals to plan accordingly for observing the launch or tracking and >> following the mission progress. >> >> The PBH-15 mission will be the Increment 5 teams attempt at breaking the >> current ARHAB distance (3,361.81 miles) and duration (49 hours, 45 >> minutes) >> records. It will include integration of an altitude control mechanism for >> reducing air vehicle weight during flight to sustain float and 30m HF >> communications via an Enhanced Morse Decoder provided by Dylan Thorner of >> Enhanced Solutions. PBH-15 will be lifted with a 54,000 cubic foot >> Zero-pressure envelope and is projected to float for long durations >> between >> 85,000-110,000. >> >> The current target for executing launch of PBH-15 is between 11:00PM -- >> 12:00AM on Thursday (4/21)/Friday (4/22), weather and approval permitting. >> >> At conclusion of Thursday's Flight Readiness Review (2PM - 3PM), the team >> will provide updated GO/ NO-GO information. >> >> During the PBH-15 mission, the Twitter feed will be updated in 30 minute >> increments at: http://twitter.com/PBH5 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> For those interested in tracking the Mission Payload, the following band >> plan and call signs will be used for PBH-15: >> >> Function >> Frequency >> Required >> HAM Level >> >> Payload >> Call Sign >> Primary Voice / Mission Communication >> 147.500MHz >> Technician >> >> Mission Payload HF (40m) >> N2XE >> Secondary Voice / Mission Communication >> Owego Repeater (Duplex) >> 146.760MHz >> Technician >> >> Mission Payload HF (30m) >> N2XE >> >> >> >> >> Mission Payload APRS >> KC2ZJH >> APRS >> 144.390MHz >> Technician >> >> >> >> 40m HF (Morse Code) >> See attached >> Technician >> >> >> >> 30m HF (Morse Code) >> See attached >> General >> >> >> >> >> Users can input data received from the Mission Payload via the "User >> Input" >> tab at http://www.projectbluehorizon.com/. >> >> Points received from the PBH-15 payload over HF can also be submitted to: >> [email protected] >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matthew T. Lewis >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:25:11 -0700 (PDT) > From: Stephen Davis <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? > To: Joe <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > According to the info at http://www.arhab.org/ARHABlaunchannouncements.html > > The launch of PBH-15 is schedule for 2330 EDT from Owego, NY (Lat/Lon: > 42.09/-76.22). > 73, > Steve > KJ4FEL > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Joe <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, April 20, 2011 9:21:04 AM > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Balloon across Atlantic 21 April? > > Can we please have the location of the launch? I know it has a 2 land > call sign, but now days that's meaningless. > sat-bb > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:57:02 -0700 > From: "Tom Workman" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <326B19D06ABA4244AC5EC771C7F482F2@K0TWHOME> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Thanks to all who provided the info I needed. My biggest problem was not > using a PROP_MODE field. > > Now back to correcting the problem. And saving my private key where I can > actually find it next time. > > Tom - K?TW > >> I've decided to give Logbook of the World (LOTW) another try. I keep > losing >> my passwords and have to start over. Maybe I'll write them down this time > :-) >> >> When I tried uploading a couple of my satellite QSOs as a test LOTW says >> that the MODE field is invalid. I had entered "SAT". I know this has been >> discussed in recent months here but I couldn't find that discusssion in >> looking at the archives. Would someone put me on the right track as to > what >> fields are required for a satellite QSO to be considered valid by LOTW? >> >> Thanks. >> Tom - K?TW > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:12:53 -0700 > From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Revisiting LOTW satellite requirements > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi Chuck! > >> I just read the LOTW FAQ and it stated that the satellite name HO-68 is >> supported by LOTW. >> I have never been able to upload any logs containing HO-68 as the sat name. >> TQSL 1.13 does not have HO-68 in the satellite drop-down menu box. >> >> Is there something I'm missing? > > Probably an updated TQSL configuration file. > > You can get that by logging into the LOTW web site, then go to "Your Account", > then "Your Certificates". There is a link where you can download the latest > TQSL configuration file (last updated on 3 March) along with your certificates > from the web site. The configuration file has - among many other things - the > list of satellites acceptable for LOTW, and log formats for those > using Cabrillo- > formatted contest logs instead of ADIF files for LOTW. > > Once you download the updated configuration file to your computer, you should > only have to click on the file to launch TQSL and update your program. After > that, you should be in good shape. > > 73! > > > > > > Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK > http://www.wd9ewk.net/ > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 229 > **************************************** _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
