The web accessible (or iPhone etc) Nasa TV feed showed it.  What were you 
watching?

Gregg Wonderly

On 7/8/2011 11:45 AM, B J wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/8/11, [email protected]<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> The glitch was a non confirmation of the gaseous vent arm
>> retract. They turned a camera to it and validated that it
>> had in fact retracted and resumed the count from there.
>> about a 2 minute hold.
>
> I heard that being mentioned.
>
> I was surprised, however, that the count resumed at T-31 seconds where it was 
> halted.  I thought that it would be restarted at a point earlier in the 
> sequence, such as T-9 minutes.  I don't ever recall a launch, even as far 
> back as Mercury, in which a countdown was stopped so close to ignition and 
> then continued from where it left off.
>
>> A nominal launch, good enough to eliminate the OMS-1 Burn.
>
> I noticed that.
>
> It's too bad that there was no live TV transmission of the ET separation seen 
> from the tank itself.  I always liked the view of the orbiter heading off.
>
> <snip>
>
>
>>> There was a glitch just as control was about to be
>> handed over to the on-board computers but, others than that,
>> it was a good launch.
>
>
> 73s
>
> Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to