>
> It doesn't look like he was in the footprint of HO-68 on that pass. I
>messed around with Orbitron and looks like possibly FO-20 beacon on 435.795?
>
>
>Dave - KB1PVH
>
FO-20 was a solid tone only the last few years it was alive as I recall. I'll
darn sure listen for it though! FO-20 is a bit higher than FO-29 and was better
for DXing from down south here.
73, Drew KO4MA
_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
