What we need is Arsene or an Oscar IV in the correct orbit...Robert WB5MZO Life member ARRL AMSAT NARS
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:40:37 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Geostationary Satellites > > Short answer: Money. They are much more expensive than the little LEO's, > CubeSat's, etc. > > 73, > > Lowell > K9LDW > > > ------ Original Message ------ > Received: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:27:53 PM CDT > From: "ka9qjg" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Geostationary Satellites > > > Hello Hope Everyone is doing Well, I know people say no such thing as a > dumb > > question So here goes What is the reason We do not have any Type of > > geostationary Satellites. Is it because they are for World Wide Use and If > > stationary one could Hit it 24/7 and Maybe park there butt on it and Run a > > Beam and Amp and take it over > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > 73 De Don KA9QJG > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
