Excellent!

Just made my financial support for Fox!

Stefan, VE4NSA

Go CubeSat Go

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Stephen  E. Belter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stefan - Alan is right, ITAR is a severe barrier to most cooperative 
> projects.  :-(
>
> Nonetheless, it was mentioned several times at the 2010 AMSAT-NA Symposium 
> and other places that we want to place our RF package on university CubeSats. 
>  For example, these quotes from the AMSAT-Fox news on the website:  "AMSAT's 
> flexible, CubeSat compatible software defined transponder is a new approach 
> providing a robust and reliable radio link for future CubeSats allowing 
> university teams to concentrate on their scientific objectives.  Future 
> CubeSat missions using AMSAT Fox technology will have an amateur space 
> service capable transponder aboard which may continue to be utilized by radio 
> amateurs once the primary scientific objectives of the University research 
> flights have been met."
>
> The development and launch of ARISSat-1 has been a significant step towards 
> our next generation satellite platform.  Fox will take the lessons learned 
> from ARISSat-1 and will repackage the hardware to fit the CubeSat form 
> factor.  To quote Tony AA2TX and AMSAT-NA VP of Engineering "When the Fox 
> project is completed, we will have something concrete to offer."
>
> So that's the plan on the CubeSat front.  The AMSAT-NA board also continues 
> to look for MEO and HEO opportunities, and for a possible ARISSat-2.
>
> 73, Steve N9IP
> --
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan P. Biddle [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:59 AM
> To: Stephen E. Belter
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: New Sats
>
> Stefan,
>
> As Steve says, providing turnkey communications is of significant interest, 
> both to AMSAT and potential users.  Of course, one always has to be aware, 
> and wary of ITAR issues for even such relatively mundane equipment.
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Stephen E. Belter
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 8:49 AM
> To: Stefan Wagener
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Sats
>
> Stefan,
>
> I believe that AMSAT-NA plans to offer semi-complete communications packages 
> to the Cubesat community.  That is one of the expected outcomes of the Fox 
> project, which is AMSAT-NA's first cubesat.
>
> 73, Steve N9IP
> --
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Stefan Wagener
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:42 AM
> To: Kevin Deane
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Sats
>
> Yes,
>
> Kevin, point made. The only way we can change that is by working closely 
> together with these projects and having a tangible influence in their 
> hardware and software development. Out of curiosity, I always wondered why 
> AMSAT would not offer semi complete communication packages, (Data, Rx, Tx) 
> for cubesats for sale, which automatically would have a set of interesting 
> protocols, tools and options embedded.
> Using RF components from DataTech or Radiometrix would potentially simplify 
> the task. The end user could spend more time and effort focusing on 
> experiments and other additional payload.
> Don't know if AMSAT ever did a market analysis for this. However, it might 
> something to consider as a proof of concept for FOX or other following 
> cubesats by AMSAT.
>
> Stefan, VE4NSA
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Kevin Deane <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> With all these new sats that are not voice, I was thinking people
>> would
> probly be more interested and get more invovled if there were something more 
> than just decoding the telemetry like SEEDS II offers Qsl cards and secret 
> words, stuff like that.
>>
>> Just thought I would throw that out there see what people think.  :)
>>
>> Kevin
>> KF7MYK
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>

_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to