I don't agree with these elitist arguments for intentionally making
things difficult.  This "anti-easy-sat" mentality doesn't buy us
anything. Let the dead horse decompose.

Driving innovation and spawning a new generation of experimenters is a
more realistic vision.  Create opportunities for people to step
outside their "box" and homebrew equipment.  That excites people.

73
Clayton
W5PFG

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, John Becker <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 02:13 PM 10/15/2012, you wrote:
>>"C" band stuff! I thought "S" band was difficult...I want hard sats not easy 
>>sats!
>>
>>73 Bob W7LRD
>
> Me too.
>
> Enough with the UHF up and VHF down or vice versa.
>
> John, W0JAB
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to