A HEO satellite with a 10 GHz downlink would be tons of fun. We've been using these along with surplus DSS dishes using a Funcube as an IF to create really cheap 10 GHz receivers that work well!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/LNB-Single-0-1dB-Satellite-Universal-Edition-Full-HD-Sky-Freesat-TV-/181180214555?pt=UK_Sound_Vision_Satellite_LNBs&hash=item2a2f2ead1b

Watch the wrap...

Mike

On 9/4/2013 1:43 PM, Gus wrote:
Truly.

However, to include operators with modest shacks, you need to allow
operation on modes A, B and/or J.  A satellite operating on 24.0 GHz
won't be of interest to the average ham.  Not until the average ham has
24.0 GHz capable antennas, feedlines, amplifiers, transceivers, etc, in
his shack.

On 09/04/2013 11:31 AM, Bryce Salmi wrote:
Yea but increasing frequency helps with that. With directional
antennas the satellite would need attitude control which would benefit
greatly from miniaturization. For the most part, miniaturization would
come from incorporating systems on chips. Most op amps and
microcontrollers are much smaller than their packages so including
those systems on a single die in a single package are capable of
massive savings in space. This is what made smart phones even possible .

Gus <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 09/04/2013 02:26 AM, Brenton Salmi wrote:

        Let's put it in another possible context: Create an extremely
        dense and reliable LEO platform in cube-sat form that weigh's
        a fraction of AO-40's weight using today's high-density
        components/systems and create a reliable and feature rich HEO
        cubesat.



    The only problem with this, is that certain components can't be
    miniaturized.  Example: Antennas.  And HEO satellites need more
    sophisticated antennas.

    Pity the cube-sat idea didn't finish up with a ten INCH cube...

    --
    73, de Gus 8P6SM
    Barbados, the easternmost isle.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

73,
Mike, N1JEZ
"A closed mouth gathers no feet"

_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to