Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections dynamically 
change your frequency to compensate for doppler?  Would this mean anyone 
engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a stable frequency?  

73 Peter ve7ngp

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Clayton Coleman
Sent: February 7, 2014 08:43
To: AMSAT-BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Listening on USB when operating CW

I assume many home station satellite operators utilize some kind of full-duplex 
radio or combination of two radios for CW on the current satellites.

Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
passband.  I realize this is not a new phenomenon.  I would assume these 
drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler correction.  If 
they were using computer control, I would assume their CW would stay on the 
same place in the transponder's passband.  It is visually apparent when the 
stations manually make larger frequency movements because of the curve 
displayed on my SDR application's waterfall display.

Many times I have been engaged in a QSO only to have someone CQ'ing on CW drift 
across my existing QSO.  Anyone who operates satellites has probably had this 
happen to them many times.  Sometimes myself or others in QSO may try to tell 
the CW operator "Hello - QSO in progress" but it is apparent they are not 
hearing us.

My question is, does it make sense for people using CW on the satellites to 
have their receiver set to USB?  Do some operators do this?  If listening on a 
VFO with USB and had your transmit VFO set to CW, would this help make it 
easier for CW ops to know when they have drifted into an existing voice QSO?

73
Clayton
W5PFG
_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to