Absolutely!  Micro-miniaturization!

But some things are difficult to miniaturize -- like a 144 MHz yagi.


On 08/01/2014 09:20 PM, Bryce Salmi wrote:
Innovation is often driven out of necessity. I see it everyday at work. Develop a baseline system that works and then optimize it. You'd be amazed what you could do with the small of a space to pack electronics into.

Bryce


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Gus <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 08/01/2014 01:24 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:

        I've noticed from reading this board's current posts and
        archives that
        there is a bias against CubeSats from some due to a belief
        that they
        are somehow inherently limited in capability, unreliable, and
        short
        lived, but there is nothing inherent in the CubeSat format
        that makes
        it that way, it's simply a standardized way to build a satellite.

    Their size and weight limitations restrict the type of antennas
    they can deploy, the number of solar panels they can carry, and
    simply the mass of silicon they can contain.

    Yes, they are cheap and launches (to LEO) are frequent, but their
    capabilities are, surely, limited by their physical nature?


-- Gus 8P6SM
    The Easternmost Isle

    _______________________________________________
    Sent via [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. Opinions
    expressed are those of the author.
    Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
    program!
    Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




--
Gus 8P6SM
The Easternmost Isle

_______________________________________________
Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to