On Saturday 29 October 2005 10:47, Sander Hoentjen wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 17:48 +0100, Tom Jenkins wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I know no-one is thinking about this at the moment, but I've been > > thinking about 0.96, 0.97, etc...and I decided that we seriously need to > > abstract all our GUI code (I want to rewrite pretty much all of it too > > > > :D) from our protocol code and have a middle layer to commuinicate > > > > between the two... there's details on the wiki... > > http://amsn.sf.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=GuiRoadmap > > check this please: > http://amsn.sourceforge.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Events > i think it is the same as what you are trying to do, right? How different are those events from plugin events? The WIKI is down so I can't read about it. Maybe we should just keep one event system instead of having two. Maybe they are already interconnected, if so just ignore me :) I have two ideas: 1) If an event gets fired by the core system, call whatever from amsn is listening to them and then call the plugin system's proc that handles events. This is the only time that events will get to plugins. This method is quite simple and can be done fast but it's more like a hack. 2) Have both merged into one. I think this is what we should do.
> Maybe contact me on msn (t jikk un @ hotm..) if you want to exchange > ideas > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > _______________________________________________ > Amsn-devel mailing list > Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel -- Karol Krizka
pgpTTcOALJUvG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
