On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:03 -0500, Youness Alaoui wrote: > Also, I saw there is already an install-rpm, but it's a copy/paste of > install.. maybe you should make it depend on the rpm rule and do a rpm > -i... agreed, otherwise no use in having the rpm
> This way, the user can do a rpm -e .. (not sure if it was -e for > uninstall)... exactly, e is for erase > do you think we should add an uninstall rule ? I'm just sharing this idea, > but I would personally not go with that idea (people will use a package > and they can just use their packaging system to uninstall) I guess we need a make uninstall, but not make rpm-uninstall, but it doesn't hut if there is ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
