On Tuesday 29 November 2005 08:31, Youness Alaoui wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:52:37 -0500, Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 November 2005 06:05, Youness Alaoui wrote: > >> who has 64 bits.. who can answer him ? > > > > What I did was just install the tls package from the gentoo portage. You > > might > > want to search for "tls" in the Mandriva install thing. > > well, the problem is that most people on the forums want to compile it and > it doesn't work.. I don't know if that's our problem, but I just wanted to > point out that we may need to add binary support for 64bits architectures. > > >> AND, do you think we should add a tls 1.5 download with the tls > >> auto-installer and tls for 64bits ? > > > > We could add tls as a dependency (an optional one?) to the RPM if it gets > > installed through some automatic thing like apt or yum. I can also > > provide > > the 64bit binaries if we want an option for autoinstalled. Also do you > > want > > to update the rest of architectures to 1.5? > > yep, I'd like to have the 64 bit binary in the auto-installer, since more > people are using 64 bits archs, we can't just say "yeah, if you use > 64bits, go compile it yourself" and also, it seems that tls 1.4 doesn't > work for 64 bit, you need 1.5 in order for it to be 'compatible' with > 64bit.. so I don't want to have a list of 1.4 and 1.5 downloads, it would > be better to have it consistent everywhere... I have created the x86_64 binary and would like to add it to the list. But since we are downloading the packages from sf.net file release system and I don't have permission to use it, could someone else upload it? I can email you the package.
And about updating the other architectures. Are there any volunteers to do it on it on their own computer or should I use the sf.net's compile farm? > can someone also confirm that 1.5 for x86 works with 64bit archs ? > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13248&package_id=2183 >6 here are the releases of tls (official), I don't see as many options as > amsn gives.. if I remember correctly we offer a lot of options, right ? I > suggest we also keep it to a minimum, remove the windows/mac because it's > already shipped with it, the only problem is source package for linux... I'll remove Win and Mac when I add the x86_64 package. > rpms and deb files (and autopackage and klik, and..) will all depend on > tcltls, so it's not a problem.. > I also would like to suggest that we automatically install tls with amsn, > instead of giving radio buttons and the choice to the user to select his > platform... using the ::tcl_platform we already know what's the platform, > so why bother asking the user ?? > Added to wiki. -- Karol Krizka
pgpoD2XVLeI4W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
