hehe, that would be me :D
I already answered this email, so I'll just say that 1 lang manager per
language would be a total mess (image,3 developpers and 30 lang managers..
are we a software or an international organisation :P) anyways, lang
managers had what they wanted and I did give you back your 4 managers you
asked for...I think it's nice this way.. maybe I'm wrong..
KaKaRoTo
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:12:04 -0500, Hatredman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Seg 12 Dez 2005 20:41, Lee Olson disse:
This is a good example of why we need to set a translation manager for
each language (perhaps the most active individual). If we have a
reliable manager for each language, they can accept translations from
the other team members of that particular language. Once the
translation manager of a particular language accepts a submission,
they will verify that it is correct, and if so, pass it on to the main
translation manager which will then verify file correctness and commit
it.
We were going in that direction, and then someone said "hey, too meny
people
with CVS write access! This will not do! Off with their heads!"
I quite agree with you, but the powers-that-be seem to think different.
--
KaKaRoTo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
