oh my god.. this thread should be in the trashcan for a looonnnnnnnnnng
time..
stop trying to find something.. I don't think it will work no matter
what...
even if there is something we could use, it would probably be a hack very
complex and I don't want to implement such feature..
first, it is completly unethical
second, it will make a lot of n00bs come
thirs, when MS fixes it, we'll be mail-bombed with "how can I"...
it's been almost 2 years now (I think) since the blocking feature was
removed from SF servers and (as you can see) people are still mailing us
to know how to get such a feature... I do not want that to happen again as
it's the most annoying questionI ever had in my whole life...
just forget about this.. I don't want it to be in amsn no matter what (and
there is NO way to do it, TRUST ME!!!)
you know that I've spent already alot of time on a lot of threads similar
to this one with people saying "there is a way", and I say "no, just trust
me", noone wants to trust me.. then they realize I was right ? so for
once, please.. trust me... there is no way, and please stop.. it's really
getting me sick now... :(
KaKaRoTo
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:49:47 -0500, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ok, just tested it.
If the contact is blocking you or is really offline does not make any
difference when trying to start a chat. Both cases will result in error
number 217.
The hypothetic doc says this would be error 216 if the contact was
offline but
blocking you. Looks like it is outdated on this point indeed.
Op zaterdag 17 december 2005 15:18, schreef Harry Vennik:
I think the old bug was a difference in how the server reported the
state
change when a contact went offline or when the contact blocked you.
But I am not 100% sure. I'll have to check when I have time...
Op zaterdag 17 december 2005 15:09, schreef Alvaro J. Iradier:
> That was a long time ago. The reply was a different code depending on
> the contact being offline, or blocking you. But then the protocol was
> fixed, and the same error code returned. Is it working again now, or
are
> you talking about an outdated information?
>
> Greets.
>
> Harry Vennik wrote:
> > I can confirm this from hypothetic protocol specs.
> > I noticed this some time ago when studying the protocol.
> > If you try to start a chat, and the contact you are trying to chat
with
> > is online but blocking you, the response you get is not the same as
> > when the contact is simply offline.
> > I don't have time to find it again right now.
> >
> > Op zaterdag 17 december 2005 14:47, schreef Alvaro J. Iradier:
> >>Could you be a bit more specific? I don't get the idea... What do
you
> >>mean "call the other client"? Just a normal conversation, a webcam
> >>invitation, or what?
> >>
> >>Greets.
> >>
> >>The One That No One Knows wrote:
> >>>Hey Alvaro & Company,
> >>>I might've found a way to check if someone has blocked you. I dont
> >>> know everything about it but i was observing the packets and i
think
> >>> that if you call the other client they reply and if they're
offline
> >>> then they are blocking you. Once again, im not sure about
everything,
> >>> like if you have to get the ip to call or anything, but i hope it
> >>> works.
> >>>
> >>>Please Reply If It Does,
> >>>Keith Morrow (a.k.a. Nontitle hehe...)
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
log
> > files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that
> > makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web.
DOWNLOAD
> > SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amsn-devel mailing list
> > Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that
makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
--
KaKaRoTo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
