On Thursday 11 May 2006 19:21, Youness Alaoui wrote: > Good remark, If everyone agrees, we'll settle the 0.96 release as the > migration date for SVN services... > when you send your answer on whether you agree or not, would you please > vote for : > 1 - don't wait for 0.96 release > > 2 - migrate at the same time as the 0.96 release > > 3 - migrate at the first RC1 of the 0.96 release (feature freeze and > sooner that 0.96) > Youness Karol
Btw, I don't really care if it's 2 or 3. Both sound good. > > > KaKaRoTo > > On Thu, 11 May 2006 19:16:47 -0400, Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 11 May 2006 10:06, Youness Alaoui wrote: > >> We received no mail yet... I will forward when we receive it (if not > >> done > >> by someone else) > >> but isn't it a good time now to switch to SVN ? I think we discussed it > >> but can't remember what kept us from doing it ? was it the commit freeze > >> that we're still trying to find the 'appropriate' time for it ? or is it > >> the various scripts we have (like for amsn-commits)... that keep us from > >> doing it ? I think we have a similar script for the mail thing.. > >> I think last discussion was about the cvs_date file.. and the > >> amsn_cvs.tar.gz filename.. can we finally decide on something and do the > >> migration ? > > > > Well, I suppose and "appropiate" time would be when we release 0.96. > > Untill > > that time we can get everything ready and the day we get 0.96 on the > > website > > we import all the code from cvs into it. The 0.96 release shouldn't be > > far > > off as the TODO seems quite small. Just make sure no new features are > > introduced :| -- Karol Krizka
pgp0WaJuQObVZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
