On Sat, 20 May 2006 07:35:58 -0400, Sander Hoentjen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 16:00 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:

Yes, I know about GIF.. but why would the guy include the other libs with
Well i found 2 downloads, full and lite, lite didn't have the libs

Oh :o omg, you're right!!! I used the full version as a base because I downloaded it to get the demo with it, that's it.. well then, I assume you're right, but then.. di dI dream thinking it's modified!!! :o I need to see a shrink now :S Thanks for noticing this. If it's not included in the lite version then it's definitely not needed!!!!!

cximage, and I'm sure (almost) that he wrote somewhere, (maybe forums?)
that the libs were modified and should not be replaced because it won't
work if you do.. why noone wants to do a diff ? you lazy bastards :p lol
I wanted, but I wasn't at home, I wrote the small email under protest of
my gilfriend, since we had to leave :P


you're back right? so...  ? :p

>> p.s.: I think this should go into 0.96 for sure, so let it be added to
>> the
>> TODO, BUT it will be a post RC1, and hopefully a pre RC2...
>> if not (if not enough manpower), we'll have to go into an RC3 before the
>> official 0.96 release...
> I agree with you...
youpiiii :D
So Fedora will be a testing ground for it ;)

cool, but I don't think we'll have a problem.. a diff would be better, but I think it's not modified since it's not shipped in the lite version.


>>
>> P.s.2: mabye OT, TkCximage is really slow, do you think we should either
>> use Img instead (assuming it has EVERYTHING we need, like anigifs,
>> resize,
>> colorize, etc...), or maybe we should really optimize it. If we decide
>> to
>> keep TkcxImage (which would be my choice for sure), how about, as a
>> side-project, completly unrelated to amsn, how about making tkcximage, a >> real tkcximage library, which means, not an extension using cximage to
>> load/save files, but wrap into Tk commands ALL the cximage methods,
>> making
>> TkCximage supercede TkImg by making it not only an image reading
>> extension
>> but also an image manipulation extension. I'm sure the tk community
>> would
>> be thrilled in having an extension allowing them to create a tkphotoshop
>> app... :p
Summer of code? :P



do we even want to do it ? maybe we do.. but it's unrelated to aMSN.. in any case, it's really an easy job and it's more of a robot job than anything.. you just wrap each function (I think it can be automtically done using a software... can't remember it's name though.. sorry)




--
KaKaRoTo


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel

Reply via email to