On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 12:30 +0200, Harry Vennik wrote: > I don't think we should include it. We're including to much already, instead > of having it as dependencies. Users without the knowledge how to install tls > themselves will be the ones using a packaging system anyway, so the packaging > system (rpm, yum, apt, whatever...) will resolve the dependency, and there is > no need for our downloading system, neither for including tls. > > Harry
Agreed for linux (and mac?), but there is also some other OS. Like I said in another mail: fedora is covered, and the RPM package is MUCH smaller then the tarball. This would be a good thing to do for all packages I guess, but it is a bit more work for packagers (initially, not in the long run).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
