YES!!! :)
hehe, a lot of new technologies.. we're also switching the user doc, help,  
FAQ and commonly asked stuff, step by steps, from the forums to this :  
http://amsn.sourceforge.net/userwiki/index.php/Main_Page
it's still very young, so not much in there, but hopefully, will soon be  
full of stuff....

KKRT

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 03:16:47 -0400, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> MY GOD WE HAVE BRANCHES
>
> OMFG
>
> hehe...nice...lol
>
> I like email for TODO, I know we are all too lazy to update the wiki.
>
> I'll try to get in touch with theses new technologies, thanks for the
> explanations, see ya
> Le 25 juin 2006 à 02:55, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
>
>> Hi Jerome,
>> It looks like you've been away for too long, and I know it's
>> impossible to
>> catch up with everything (you probably did a 'select all emails'-
>> >'mark as
>> read' :P ), so let me brief you in really fast on what we currently
>> have :
>>
>> I don't know if you were still here but we dropped CVS and we're
>> now using
>> SVN, Subversion is so much better, there is no more delay between
>> anonymous and developer repositories and it's nice to say to a user
>> "this
>> was fixed in revision XXXX" (without talking about all the
>> functionality
>> SVN gives us, like 'svn blame', take a look at it, I just love
>> it! :) )
>>
>> We did have a TODO, but we used your method for 0.95, which means
>> an email
>> that we always update with added/removed items and the subject
>> being "0.96
>> TODO".. I think if we want to add something to a 'todo', we should
>> simply
>> create a new task item for it...
>>
>> About the release, the rc1 and the development : good news, we're
>> finally
>> using branches!!! this means, no more feature freeze, we have a 0_96
>> branch where we put only 0.96 related commits, in the trunk/ (no
>> branch)
>> we can commit whatever we want, it's already "0.97b" in there...
>> when we
>> commit a bug fix, we directly patch the 0.96 branch copy of it and
>> commit
>> the same bugfix to the 0.96 branch...
>> This means, if you decide to take care of that, you can still do it
>> in the
>> trunk/ and not worry about the 0.96 release at all..
>> this also means if you commit a bugfix to the trunk/, you should worry
>> about merging it to the branch too if it applies.. but we have some
>> people
>> (vivia/billiob/harry I think) who periodically check every commit
>> log and
>> see if it should go to the branch too or not.
>>
>> I hope it answers your questions, if any more questions arise, ask me.
>>
>> KaKaRoTo
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 02:40:11 -0400, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah the thing is I don't want that to be added after RC1 and before
>>> the release. Backward compatibility seems to be an issue and this
>>> kind of patch probably needs a lot of testing, that's not the time to
>>> add bugs in that kind of important feature (keeping cached pictures).
>>>
>>> I think it's better to wait for the feature and having a small issue
>>> than adding a big chance in a release candidate and risking to add a
>>> big bug (or risking to delay the release too much)
>>>
>>> Can we add it to the TODO for next release? Is there still someone
>>> taking care of that?
>>>
>>> Do we keep a list of known issues somewhere? We can add that in that
>>> list..."if you have too many cached pictures, amsn can be very slow,
>>> will be fixed in next release".
>>> Le 25 juin 2006 à 01:37, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Yes, I agree, there is a patch that was sent that allows amsn to
>>>> store the
>>>> cached DP in a per user subdirectory, it's still pending for commit
>>>> because we're not sure we want to put it in 0.96, and we're not
>>>> sure if
>>>> the patch is complete, if it doesn't introduce a bug, amsn should
>>>> also be
>>>> backward compatible, so we should maybe do a
>>>> if { [llength [glob *.dat]] > 0 } {
>>>>     ShowAPleaseWaitMessage
>>>>     moveDPFilesToSubdirs
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> something like that in the start of amsn... anyways, noone wanted
>>>> to take
>>>> care of that, so it's still pending.. if you want to take care of
>>>> it, I
>>>> could try to find the patch, you're up to it ?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> KaKaRoTo
>>
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
>> security?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
>> job easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
>> Geronimo
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?
>> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amsn-devel mailing list
>> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>
>
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job  
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache  
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Amsn-devel mailing list
> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel



-- 
KaKaRoTo

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel

Reply via email to