On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 11:27 -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:41:23PM +0200, Philippe Valembois - Phil wrote: > > > 2 - we don't NEED an ansi + unicode bins, nor code, it should ALL be > > > unicode and that's it! > > No because on Win 95/98/Me some functions are implemented in A version only > > no, they are implemented in A and W versions but the include files provided > with VS6 don't have them defined.. > anyways, if you say support for unicode is partial in win95/98/me, then we > got a problem, don't tell me we'll > have to provide two windows installers, one for 95/98/me and one for > 2000/xp..
Couple of things: MS doesn't support win98/me, let alone 95.. Why should we? :P I remember from a distant past that some programs (emule?) had you download a dll to get unicode support, but i thought that was for win 95, and 98 had it built in.. not sure though, as it both are ancient OS'es that are long due for replacement. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
