2009/4/1 Youness Alaoui <kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net>: > Yes, we thought about it, but a little bit differently... > We currently have amsn-remote for amsn 0.x which is kind of > the same thing and since amsn2 is supposed to keep the same > feature set as amsn1, then i guess it would have to support > something like that! > Our idea was to have a 'remote-server' front end, which is > basically nothing more than a headless f-e that exposes a > simple protocol over some socket. > Then you would use the 'remote-client' front end on some > other machine and you can remote control your connection, > see pending messages, etc...
Coolio! > I guess a command line version would be interesting to have > too, don't know yet how we would design it, but it's > definitely a good idea! Do you have any suggestions about > the design for this? Maybe allowing front ends to add > custom command line options? Nope, haven't thought about it and since I am working hard on my remaining exams right now I probably won't for the next days ;) I have some idea about the issues we must face, but I'll have to elaborate on them before sharing, otherwise you won't understand a thing :P -- Stéphane ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
