On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 17:46 +0100, Garrett LeSage wrote: > One kind of funny example I encountered: A quite-technical co-worker who > routinely installs Fedora for work told me that he originally thought > his hard drive was "bad". He eventually even bought a new hard drive — > and after thinking that one was marked as being bad too. Of course, > after a little bit of questioning, it turned out that it's just how > Anaconda flags a necessary step — even when it should not be necessary > (as in the case of a blank drive).
IIRC, in the initial iterations of the current anaconda (i.e. in F18), INSTALLATION DESTINATION was not mandatory and would auto-configure itself when possible. We explicitly chose to move away from that and require the user to at least visit it and confirm the defaults. I don't entirely recall why, but presumably we had a reason. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
