On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:

ST>>On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jim Balcom wrote:
ST>>>
ST>>> /usr/local/bin/analog.new: Warning L: Large number of corrupt lines in
ST>>> logfile
ST>>>   /var/log/wn.log.001: try different LOGFORMAT
ST>>>     Current logfile format:
ST>>>       %S %j %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j%w%r%wHTTP%j" %c %b\n
ST>>>       %S %j %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%j%w%r" %c %b\n
ST>>>       %S %j %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j] "%r" %c %b\n
ST>>> 
ST>>
ST>>So, it's not in the format you asked for. The LOGFORMAT only affects
ST>>logfiles occurring later in the same config file. (Use DEFAULTLOGFORMAT to
ST>>affect all logfiles not occurring below another LOGFORMAT command).

I guess that I am having a case of the stupids today.
The format of /var/log/wn.log.001 is the same all of the way through. Analog
is only being asked to analyze this one file. I have only one LOGFORMAT
command in the config file.

I am not understanding what you are telling me that I need to do to correct
this situation.

-= Jim =-

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jim's Linux-Operated Underground Bomb Shelter
(Specializing in Hot Peppers and Mushrooms, and wayward kids)
----------------------------------------------------------------

Tagline for Wednesday, October 20, 1999 at 11:05 AM:

Some days you're a bug, other days a windshield.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This Linux System has been up 462 hours  

My web page: http://www.idkent.com
----------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe analog-help" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to