> Whoops, sorry, I just sent the half the original message back to the list by
> pressing the wrong key. CTRL-C is too close to CTRL-X...
Gee, I think I said that quite recently myself. I should have realized
that post would be too long for the list to process normally anyway- I'll
keep it short this time.
> Anyway, Jim, I think you're still confused. LOGFORMAT/LOGFILE pairs don't
> define log formats for logfiles in the way that you seem to expect. A
> LOGFILE command just says "analyse this LOGFILE with the current LOGFORMAT".
> It doesn't define a format for that logfile in general, which will hold if
> you specify that logfile elsewhere.
So in other words, the order of the logfile/format commands makes no
difference to Analog? Thus these two examples would yield the same
results in the output, no?
LOGFILE log0 LOGFILE log0
LOGFORMAT format1 LOGFILE log1
LOGFILE log1 LOGFILE log2
LOGFORMAT format2 LOGFILE log3
LOGFILE log2 LOGFORMAT format1
LOGFILE log3 LOGFORMAT format2
> And if you want to specify a format for logfiles on the command line, you
> just need to use DEFAULTLOGFORMAT.
Interesting. I seem to have completely missed that paragraph in the
docs. <doh!> Not only is the feature I wanted already implemented, it has
an easily identifiable name- yes, I am an idiot. :)
-=Jim=-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe analog-help" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
