Quoting Stephen Turner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Quoting Stephen Turner
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1] Is it safe to assume that the memory usage
for
> > > > analog to process a set of cache files will be
about
> > > > the total of the size of those files? (e.g. the
> > weekly
> > > > report used 1.5GB -- the sum of all the cache
file
> > > > sizes).
> > > >
> > >
> > > No. Only if all the items in each of the cache
files
> > are distinct. The main
> > > memory constraint is the total length of all the
> > distinct names of all the
> > > items.
> >
> > But this would be a maximum then? Or close to?
> >
>
> Err... Yeah, I guess so. And if you combined them all
into a single cache
> file it would be close to the actual amount.
Good. Thanks. A full run of Feb with HOSTLOWMEM 3 and
FILELOWMEM 3 used about 13GB of memeory. By combining
the dailiy cache files for the month I think (if the
estimates are rigth) we can keep this down to > 7GB.
And get the HOST and REQUEST reports.
Thanks for the help,
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
