On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, tim wrote:
>
> hello ...
>
> We had this thread a little while ago, but I guess I forgot what came of it. Sorry.
>
> I'm asking again since I'm noticing more and more people appear to be using NT, or
>Windows 2000.
>
> (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0) ... this is what appears in the log file. NT
>5.0 is the real name, Windows
> 2000 is the marketing name.
>
> Thus, should analog be reporting this as Windows 2000 as well? Well, since Windows
>2000 is nothing more than NT 5
> ... I don't know.
>
> What's the viewpoint here?
Well, I can give an update as I just coded it in my development version over
the weekend.
It should be Windows 2000, and will be in the next version. (The previous
code was added before I knew what the browser string in Windows 2000 would
look like). But some browsers (including Netscape, currently) don't put
which version of NT they're for. They will continue to appear under Windows
NT even if they were used from Windows 2000.
--
Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
"8th March 2000. National No Smoking Day. Ash Wednesday." (On a calendar)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
