[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think I understand why Analog doesn't analyse error log files... does
> anybody know about one that would be able give more info than ErrorChk
> (http://www.ensta.fr/internet/unix/www/ErrorChk.html) that seems to a bit
> outdated?
The problem with error logs is that they're meant to be human-readable and
are hard to analyse with a program. They are not consitent across
imlpementations and are often localized. However, most of the errors that you
would want to know about are covered in the access logs (missing files,
server errors, etc.) and Analog does analyse this.
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
