Ron Woodall wrote:
> > Did you change from common log format in June to Combined (or
> >Combined + cookie or vhost) in August?
>
> Ok, this is interesting. I have no control over how the server
> works or how it generates a log file. In july I went through a change-over
> to where the server automatically compresses the files daily instead of me
> trying to compress them monthly. However, I thought I took this into
> account when I ran the reports. First, I downloaded the latest analog.
> Then, I re-ran the reports for June and got an error message. I set
> "logformat = combined" and reran the reports and got the same results as my
> previous version of analog (2.90b4.) Then I ran the August logs. I compared
> the log structures of the two months and found them identical in their
> field structure.
Well, obviously compression is coming into play or else Analog wouldn't even give
you a report. And if you were comparing compressed and uncompressed logfile
sizes, then June (which would likely be uncomressed) would be larger.
> > That would easily tripple the size of your
> >logfiles with the same number of requests.
>
> There is nothing to indicate that such is the case. Other options?
What about ranges of dates? Does the August report include requests from Aug 1st
to Aug 31st? Does the file include any requests outside of this range?
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
