> If each of your 300 sites had 1 request from 1 visitor each, you'd have a
> "collective" report showing 300 unique visitors. But in reality, there
> would be no way to tell if there had been 300 unique visitors, or if one
> person had visited all 300 sites, or 10 people had visited 30 sites each,
> etc.
>
> If you ignore all the limitations of proxy servers and ISPs recycling
> dialup IP addresses, the closest thing to a total of unique visitors would
> be a report of Unique Hosts across all 300 log files - that is, a single
> report run against all 300 logfiles at once, not a sum of the Unique Hosts
> extracted from 300 seperate reports.
>
> Given the inaccuracy of the numbers involved, your best bet may be to just
> do one or two runs of just the host report aagainst all 300 sites, and get
> a multiplier factor that you can apply in future.


Yes, I have a program that already traverses the logfiles directory and
processes the logfiels to produce just the summary report for each log. What
I asked was, "What is the closest approximation to use to get total users."
I know that this number is not really obtainable but, in my fellow analog
users opinions, I was wondersing what the consensus is for the closest
approximation of total users. I understand that everything is relative.

It looks to me like "Distinct hosts served" may be the closest approximation
to what I would want.


Successful requests: 424,719
Average successful requests per day: 204,409
Successful requests for pages: 213,995
Average successful requests for pages per day: 102,991
Failed requests: 3,112
Redirected requests: 522
Distinct files requested: 52
Distinct hosts served: 308
Corrupt logfile lines: 37
Unwanted logfile entries: 533,981
Data transferred: 328.631 Mbytes
Average data transferred per day: 158.164 Mbytes



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aengus
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [analog-help] Best way to show unique visitors/traffic....
>
>
> From: "John Cesta - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Since we host over 300 Web sites (NT)and each site generates its own
> > logfile, I'd like to get a report that totals the total traffic on the
> > server. I can do this by using a program we have that creates an analog
> > report for each Web. Curretly I only total the Data transferred. What
> > I'd like to see is a total of unique visitors or traffic. I know that a
> > total ofunique vistitors is almost an impossibility (an accurate one
> > nayway) but which piece of summary information below would I want to
> > total to get a close approximation? Would it be Successful requests,
> > Distinct files requested?
>
> John, you can't extract this information from 300 seperate reports. If you
> look at a very extreme example, it may demonstrate why the approach you
> propose doesn't make sense.
>
> If each of your 300 sites had 1 request from 1 visitor each, you'd have a
> "collective" report showing 300 unique visitors. But in reality, there
> would be no way to tell if there had been 300 unique visitors, or if one
> person had visited all 300 sites, or 10 people had visited 30 sites each,
> etc.
>
> If you ignore all the limitations of proxy servers and ISPs recycling
> dialup IP addresses, the closest thing to a total of unique visitors would
> be a report of Unique Hosts across all 300 log files - that is, a single
> report run against all 300 logfiles at once, not a sum of the Unique Hosts
> extracted from 300 seperate reports.
>
> Given the inaccuracy of the numbers involved, your best bet may be to just
> do one or two runs of just the host report aagainst all 300 sites, and get
> a multiplier factor that you can apply in future.
>
> Aengus
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
> mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
> List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to