Hello, I am trying to figure out why Analog is reporting less requests than there really are.
I think it is caused by some *REF*EXCLUDE commands. We need to exclude some referrals (from our own server), so we use this: REFLINKEXCLUDE http://example.com/* REDIRREFLINKEXCLUDE http://example.com/* REFEXCLUDE http://example.com/* REFEXCLUDE http://www.example.com/* REFSITEEXCLUDE http://example.com/* REFSITEEXCLUDE http://www.example.com/* It seems that Analog excludes the whole line with those referers. Is that true? The problem is that we have log lines like this: 112.227.54.4 - - [08/Jan/2002:15:58:33 +0000] "GET /track/0/site/loggedin/oink HTTP/1.1" 200 85 "http://www.example.com/oink"; "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; T312461)" There are out tracking 'images'. If Analog excludes the whole line based on the referrer, then we will excluding 90% of our hits... I thought that using those *REF*EXCLUDE commands only excluded those lines from referral reports, so www.example.com/oink here wouldn't be counted in the ref and refsite reports, but the request would count, unless excluded by some other command. Can anyone set me straight, please? Thanks, Otis +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
