"Aengus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No you don't - if 401 was treated as a success, you'd get 2 "successful" > requests for that item. If you look closely at your log files, you see > that every time a 401 response code is sent, the item is requested again > immediately afterwards - the first time generates a 401, which causes the > browser to send the request a second time, but with authentication > information.
Yes I do. Strange as it sounds -and I don't like to dicuss the usefulness of this, it isn't useful and it doesn't make any sense, but I am not the one to decide this- our internal server is configured in such a way that the respective 200 coming out of a 401 are NOT recorded. Again, I think that the way how our server is setup does not make any sense, but I cannot influence that decision. According to your reply I assume that I will have to continue with what I did before (search&replace). Anyways, thanks for your reply and excuse me for getting a little defensive here, but I already had too many sleepless nights over this. And indeed, I could have included the above description in my first email. Best Regards, Thorsten Franzke -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
