On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Robert Brenstein wrote: > >APACHELOGFORMAT (%S - %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j %j] "%j %r %j" %c %b "%f" > >LOGFORMAT (%S - %j [%d/%M/%Y:%h:%n:%j %j] "%j %r %j" %c %b "%f" "%B""%u") > > What is a difference between using APACHELOGFORMAT and LOGFORMAT > commands? The doc just states that Appache users may find the former > more convienient without explaining as to why. They both seem to > accept the same format specifications. >
No, they don't. APACHELOGFORMAT takes Apache's LogFormat syntax. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
