On Fri, 3 May 2002, Maff Rigby wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the reply - I understand what you're saying but how come the 2
> different sets of results are using the same logfiles from the same machine,
> with the same LOGFORMAT (%T) for both? :)
>
> Surely 1 page doesn't record it's processing time in milliseconds and the
> other in seconds?
>
OK, I lied. Because of a horrid hack, if there are no times <= 500 ms but
> 0 ms, analog guesses that the format was %t not %T. This is unlikely to go
wrong except with very small logfiles, but maybe it explains it in your
case?
Oh, and if you want to fix it, or just check this explanation, I think you
should be able to do it by deleting lines 812 - 814 of output.c,
else if (array[1].reqs + array[2].reqs + array[3].reqs + array[4].reqs +
array[5].reqs + array[6].reqs == 0) /* assume %t not %T */
names = ptnames2;
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
| mailing list, go to
| http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
| List archives are available at
| http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
| http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
| http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
