Julian Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, without "cheating" and re-writing the 202 as a response code as an > error in the 400 range when I take the raw logs and re-write them as > common log format, is there a way to change analog's behavior to work > with non-compliant response codes?
Given that you're re-writing the logs anyway, I'd suggest just "fixing" the error code. I don't think you'll find a more satisfactory solution. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
