Szegő Ákos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:09 AM):
> Looking at my latest Analog report, robots from the main engines > (easily identifiable from the Host Report) account for much more > than what the OS Report tells me (at least double). The OS Report and ROBOTINCLUDE work only on the user agent name (Browser field). If the robot does not properly identify itself through this mechanism, Analog will not count it as such. > My ROBOTINCLUDE list is quite long, having appended to it the > Wadsack-additions as well as some items on my own. However, > these additions have absolutely no effect. I recently received a report that the add-on list had a minor bug in it. This has been updated to provide a better match for user agents. > Another thing: this line in the additional robot-list made all OS to > be "Known robots": > "ROBOTINCLUDE ???*" Thank you for catching that. I have updated the robot list to escape that item. -- Jeremy Wadsack Wadsack-Allen Digital Group +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
